https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27355

--- Comment #3 from Sirus Shahini <sirus.shahini at gmail dot com> ---
> I would disagree with that categorization.  The bug is not triggered by well
> formed assembler directives, but only by fuzzed ones.  The assembler
> generated by  gcc for example should never trigger this problem.

By critical I was referring to the consequences of a successful exploitation
through a crafted assembly input. Of course a normal compile of a C/C++ file
won't cause that much of a trouble but in security assessment of a bug, how a
malicious input is given to the vulnerable program isn't usually related to its
security impact.

Thanks,
Sirus

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to