https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27309
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liska <mliska at suse dot cz> ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> Hi Martin,
>
> The change was made so that the output from the binutils readelf would be
> closer to that of the elfutils readelf. Vis:
>
> Old Binutils:
> <14> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x69):
> ../sysdeps/x86_64/crti.S
>
> 2.36 Binutils:
> <14> DW_AT_name : (strp) (offset: 0x69): ../sysdeps/x86_64/crti.S
>
> Elfutils:
> name (strp) "../sysdeps/x86_64/crti.S"
I've got this point, makes sense. But I don't get why is that related to --wide
option?
To be honest, the output of non-wide mode is longer and more verbose than
--wide option
output:
$ readelf --debug-dump=info --wide /tmp/sample_struct.o | head -n20 | grep
offset
<11> DW_AT_name : (strp) (offset: 0x12d):
mpers-m32/sample_struct.c
<15> DW_AT_comp_dir : (strp) (offset: 0x89):
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/strace-5.10
<20> DW_AT_name : (strp) (offset: 0x56): unsigned char
$ readelf --debug-dump=info /tmp/sample_struct.o | head -n20 | grep offset
<11> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x12d):
mpers-m32/sample_struct.c
<15> DW_AT_comp_dir : (indirect string, offset: 0x89):
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/strace-5.10
<20> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x56): unsigned char
...
> Can the strace configure script be adapted to cope with both versions
> of readelf's output ?
I can report that to them. It's unpleasant that parsing would depend
on the version of binutils.
Thanks,
Martin
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
