https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26626
--- Comment #20 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #17) > A point raised on https://reviews.llvm.org/D89687 is that "undefined-symbol" > is more appropriate than "missing-symbol": the symbol is present, just > "undefined". Ok - I have changed the keyword. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
