https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26580
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra <amo...@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=36efe0aea5f7e5088f79e4c8d0265de0c0ec2be9 commit 36efe0aea5f7e5088f79e4c8d0265de0c0ec2be9 Author: Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> Date: Thu Sep 10 18:46:14 2020 +0930 Re: PR26580, Size and alignment of commons vs as-needed shared lib Some MIPS targets, for reasons I didn't analyse, use the larger common symbol in a shared lib rather than a smaller common in an executable. That doesn't seem unreasonable, so allow that to pass for pr26580-2. bfin-elf complains about not supporting copy relocs, but it's quite silly to want a copy reloc for common symbols, so leave the fail there. mn10300-elf and score-elf both fail the test with "PHDR segment not covered by LOAD segment". Other tests fail similarly so one more doesn't hurt. The failure is a consequence of supporting dynamic objects but setting EMBEDDED in ld scripts. PR 26580 * testsuite/ld-elf/pr26580-2.sd: Accept undefined symbol. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
