https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26090
Bug ID: 26090
Summary: Incorrect exclude.exp
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
exclude.exp has
if { [ld_link $ld tmpdir/exclude.so "--exclude-libs libexclude.a --shared
tmpdir/exclude1.o -Ltmpdir -lexclude"]
&& [ld_nm $nm "-D" tmpdir/exclude.so]
&& ! [info exists nm_output(exclude_common)]
&& ! [info exists nm_output(exclude_sym)] } {
pass $test5
} else {
fail $test5
}
tic6x-elf has
ret->elf.is_relocatable_executable = 1;
/* True if this target has relocatable executables, so needs dynamic
section symbols. */
bfd_boolean is_relocatable_executable;
"nm -D" reports:
02001380 B _HEAP_MAX
00001380 B _HEAP_START
02101380 B _STACK_START
0000137c b exclude_common
0000126c D include_sym
FAIL: ld exclude symbols from archive - --exclude-libs libexclude
It is wrong to check if exclude_common is in the dynamic symbol table
without checking its binding.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
