https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25295
--- Comment #10 from Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> --- Thanks for CCing me. I'm interested on this topic. I expressed my feelings on https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2019-November/108784.html and https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23840 My idea is that we should treat `.symver foo, bar@V1` as "renaming foo to bar@V1" ( https://reviews.llvm.org/rL369233; This should be the same as Comment #3), just like what we do with the 3-@ variant `.symver foo, bar@@@V1` https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2019-November/108784.html(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > (In reply to hubicka from comment #5) > > > Where do you see "export foo and foo@VERS_1"? All I see is that the > > > alias gets > > > the same attributes as the original symbol, thus it will be external iff > > > the > > > original symbol is. > > Yes, but I want to implement only foo@VERS_1 in the unit, not foo, so I > > do not want to see foo in the symbol table, just foo@VERS_1 and this > > does not seem to be possible with current .symver > > (there is @@@ vairant that does that for default defs) > > > > Honza > > How abou > > .symver foo, foo@VERS_1, hidden > > It will mark foo as hidden. I would hope we just rename the symbol (i.e. drop foo). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
