https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25022

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > Fixed for 2.35.
> 
> Not quite:
> 
> Checking Binutils in: dlx-elf ...  LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: frv-elf ...  LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: d30v-elf ... LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: mn10200-elf ...  LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: ms1-elf ... LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: mt-elf ...  LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: xgate-elf ... LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: fr30-elf ...  LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: ft32-elf ... LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: iq2000-elf ...  LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: pj-elf ...  LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> Checking Binutils in: s12z-elf ... LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/pr25022    
> 
> Could you have a look please ?
> 

Should be fixed now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to