https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25236
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> --- Maybe we should discuss on the generic ABI mailing list. It is very late here (01:00) so I'll not do that now. If you create a thread, can you CC me? My feeling is that a STN_COMMON (STT_COMMON) definition in a shared object should be treated as a regular definition, not a common symbol. It is subject to copy relocations. Only STN_COMMON (STT_COMMON) from object files are assigned st_size comparing semantics. If we choose the interpretation that the common definition from a shared object wins, it will break the rule that object file definitions beat shared definitions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
