https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25167
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu <h...@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dc2be329b9508395b7270b7c3bebc19a6f1e2e07 commit dc2be329b9508395b7270b7c3bebc19a6f1e2e07 Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> Date: Fri Nov 8 09:31:06 2019 -0800 i386: Only check suffix in instruction mnemonic We should check suffix in instruction mnemonic when matching instruction. In Intel syntax, normally we check for memory operand size. But the same mnemonic with 2 different encodings can have the same memory operand size and i.suffix is set to LONG_DOUBLE_MNEM_SUFFIX from memory operand size in Intel syntax to distinguish them. When there is no suffix in mnemonic, we check LONG_DOUBLE_MNEM_SUFFIX in i.suffix for mnemonic suffix. gas/ PR gas/25167 * config/tc-i386.c (match_template): Don't check instruction suffix set from operand. * testsuite/gas/i386/code16.d: New file. * testsuite/gas/i386/code16.s: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/i386/i386.exp: Run code16. * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-branch-4.l: Updated. opcodes/ PR gas/25167 * i386-opc.tbl: Remove IgnoreSize from cmpsd and movsd. * i386-tbl.h: Regenerated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
