https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25012
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |2.34
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
Fixed for 2.34 by
commit 3f9aad111cea2f25877d0a6b404956769c14faee
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Date: Fri Sep 20 10:18:15 2019 +0200
x86-64: fix handling of PUSH/POP of segment register
Commit 21df382b91 ("x86: fold SReg{2,3}") went too far: Folding 64-bit
PUSH/POP templates into non-64-bit ones isn't correct, due to the
different operand widths, and hence suffixes permitted. Restore the
separate templates.
Add tests of PUSH/POP with q suffix and %fs/%gs operands to the
testsuite. While doing so also add PUSHF/POPF ones _without_ suffix.
and on 2.33 branch by
commit 20057c8c5e67ffdfb1a7b6a4ef3d337ea27663d1
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Date: Fri Sep 20 10:18:15 2019 +0200
x86-64: fix handling of PUSH/POP of segment register
Commit 21df382b91 ("x86: fold SReg{2,3}") went too far: Folding 64-bit
PUSH/POP templates into non-64-bit ones isn't correct, due to the
different operand widths, and hence suffixes permitted. Restore the
separate templates.
Add tests of PUSH/POP with q suffix and %fs/%gs operands to the
testsuite. While doing so also add PUSHF/POPF ones _without_ suffix.
(cherry picked from commit 3f9aad111cea2f25877d0a6b404956769c14faee)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
