https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24912
Bug ID: 24912
Summary: g++.dg/lto/pr90990 FAILs with gld 2.32.51
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: marxin.liska at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Copy from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91376:
've just tried Solaris/SPARC and x86 bootstraps with gas and gld from binutils
master. Doing so revealed a failure not present when using gas/gld 2.32:
+FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr90990 cp_lto_pr90990_0.o-cp_lto_pr90990_0.o link, -O0 -flto
-flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin
+FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr90990 cp_lto_pr90990_0.o-cp_lto_pr90990_0.o link, -O0 -flto
-fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects
+FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr90990 cp_lto_pr90990_0.o-cp_lto_pr90990_0.o link, -O2 -flto
-flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects
+FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr90990 cp_lto_pr90990_0.o-cp_lto_pr90990_0.o link, -O2 -flto
-fuse-linker-plugin
The tests FAIL with
/vol/gcc/bin/gld-2.32.51: g++-dg-lto-pr90990-01.exe.lto.o: plugin needed to
handle lto object
Just replacing gld-2.32.51 with gld-2.32 makes the failure go away. I don't
believe that this is a traget issue, though, because on gcc-testresults there
are reports of the same failure on Linux/ia64, Linux/powerpc64le, and PRU.
It would be good to have this fixed before binutils 2.33 hit the streets.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
