https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24627
Bug ID: 24627
Summary: readelf -V output is ugly
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: maskray at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
% readelf -V /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
Version symbols section '.gnu.version' contains 2247 entries:
Addr: 0000000000016a3a Offset: 0x016a3a Link: 4 (.dynsym)
000: 0 (*local*) 1b (GLIBC_PRIVATE) 1b (GLIBC_PRIVATE) 1c
(GLIBC_2.3)
004: 1b (GLIBC_PRIVATE) 1b (GLIBC_PRIVATE) 0 (*local*) 1b
(GLIBC_PRIVATE)
...
Version definition section '.gnu.version_d' contains 26 entries:
Addr: 0x0000000000017bc8 Offset: 0x017bc8 Link: 5 (.dynstr)
000000: Rev: 1 Flags: BASE Index: 1 Cnt: 1 Name: libc.so.6
0x001c: Rev: 1 Flags: none Index: 2 Cnt: 1 Name: GLIBC_2.2.5
...
Version needs section '.gnu.version_r' contains 1 entry:
Addr: 0x0000000000017f60 Offset: 0x017f60 Link: 5 (.dynstr)
000000: Version: 1 File: ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 Cnt: 2
0x0010: Name: GLIBC_2.3 Flags: none Version: 28
...
* In the output .gnu.version and .gnu.version_d, `Addr:` is indented by 2.
* `000000` probably should be printed as `0x0000`
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
