https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24546
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #6) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5) > > That is the reason for the current behavior. > > But you've introduced the Intel64 and AMD64 attributes, which could be used > here as well to distinguish the behavior. Also for LFS, LGS, and LSS then. > > Similarly conditional branches (including LOOP etc) would want handling to > match that of near CALL/JMP afaict. Care to make a patch? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
