https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24485
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu <h...@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7cb22ff84745da0856bf74578b9bd7dff4379ed5 commit 7cb22ff84745da0856bf74578b9bd7dff4379ed5 Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> Date: Fri Apr 26 10:19:53 2019 -0700 i386: Don't add 0x66 prefix to IRET for .code16gcc The .code16gcc directive supports 16bit mode with 32-bit address. Since IRET (opcode 0xcf) in 16bit mode returns from an interrupt in 16bit mode, we shouldn't add 0x66 prefix for IRET. PR gas/24485 * config/tc-i386.c (process_suffix): Don't add DATA_PREFIX_OPCODE to IRET for .code16gcc. * testsuite/gas/i386/jump16.s: Add IRET tests. * testsuite/gas/i386/jump16.d: Updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
