https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23499
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
I am testing this:
diff --git a/bfd/elflink.c b/bfd/elflink.c
index b24fb95848..02618bed8f 100644
--- a/bfd/elflink.c
+++ b/bfd/elflink.c
@@ -686,13 +686,11 @@ bfd_elf_record_link_assignment (bfd *output_bfd,
&& !h->def_regular)
h->root.type = bfd_link_hash_undefined;
- /* If this symbol is not being provided by the linker script, and it is
- currently defined by a dynamic object, but not by a regular object,
- then clear out any version information because the symbol will not be
- associated with the dynamic object any more. */
- if (!provide
- && h->def_dynamic
- && !h->def_regular)
+ /* If this symbol is currently defined by a dynamic object, but not
+ by a regular object, then clear out any version information because
+ the symbol will not be associated with the dynamic object any
+ more. */
+ if (h->def_dynamic && !h->def_regular)
h->verinfo.verdef = NULL;
/* Make sure this symbol is not garbage collected. */
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
