https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22967
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Martin,
Thanks.
Now the question is what letter should we use for global ifunc symbols ?
I see three options:
1. Use 'I' for global ifunc symbols and another character (eg '>') for
indirect symbols.
2. Leave 'I' as it is (ie indicating an indirect symbol) and use
another character (eg 'F') for global ifuncs.
3. Leave 'I' as it is and use another pair of characters (eg 'f' and 'F')
for ifuncs symbols.
Do you have any preference ?
We also have the issue of backwards compatibility. There are probably
tools out there the rely upon the current characters returned by nm, so
this behaviour will have to be controlled by a command line option.
Perhaps something like: --global-ifunc-char=<character>
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
