https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22929

--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot 
gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu <h...@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=347a87745eab23d8427349787bde4a938a1e8c3e

commit 347a87745eab23d8427349787bde4a938a1e8c3e
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Mar 8 06:36:40 2018 -0800

    x86: Treat relocation against IFUNC symbol as FUNC

    When resolving a relocation against IFUNC symbol in a SHT_NOTE section
    without SHF_ALLOC, we treat it as relocation against FUNC symbol since
    it needs the address of IFUNC symbol, not the address returned by IFUNC
    function.

    bfd/

        PR ld/22929
        * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Treat relocation
        against IFUNC symbol in SHT_NOTE section without SHF_ALLOC as
        relocation against FUNC symbol.
        * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_relocate_section): Likewise.

    ld/

        PR ld/22929
        * testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Run PR ld/22929 test.
        * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Likewise.
        * testsuite/ld-i386/pr22929.d: New file.
        * testsuite/ld-i386/pr22929.s: Likewise.
        * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22929.d: Likewise.
        * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr22929.s: Likewise.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to