https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22880
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Bjorn Pagen from comment #2) Hi Bjorn, > I used clang-5.0.1: OK - so that explains why we are seeing different results. But I also think that it conforms my theory that this is a clang bug and not a binutils bug. So it really ought to be reported there. I should also note that configure code in question comes from the config/acx.m4 file which is actually part of gcc. The binutils project makes use of it, but the gcc project is the official owner of the file. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils