https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22789
--- Comment #1 from Miloš Stojanović <milos.stojano...@rt-rk.com> ---
This patch should solves it. Added additional check to see if function name was
retrieved successfully, if not, a call is made to function that retrieves it.
Solution is taken from generic _bfd_elf_find_nearest_line function from elf.c.
diff --git a/bfd/elfxx-mips.c b/bfd/elfxx-mips.c
index 285401367d..feed1f4928 100644
--- a/bfd/elfxx-mips.c
+++ b/bfd/elfxx-mips.c
@@ -12655,15 +12655,18 @@ _bfd_mips_elf_find_nearest_line (bfd *abfd, asymbol
**symbols,
if (_bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line (abfd, symbols, NULL, section, offset,
filename_ptr, functionname_ptr,
line_ptr, discriminator_ptr,
- dwarf_debug_sections,
- ABI_64_P (abfd) ? 8 : 0,
- &elf_tdata (abfd)->dwarf2_find_line_info))
- return TRUE;
-
- if (_bfd_dwarf1_find_nearest_line (abfd, symbols, section, offset,
- filename_ptr, functionname_ptr,
- line_ptr))
- return TRUE;
+ dwarf_debug_sections,ABI_64_P (abfd) ? 8 :
0,
+ &elf_tdata (abfd)->dwarf2_find_line_info)
+ || _bfd_dwarf1_find_nearest_line (abfd, symbols, section, offset,
+ filename_ptr, functionname_ptr,
+ line_ptr))
+ {
+ if (!*functionname_ptr)
+ _bfd_elf_find_function (abfd, symbols, section, offset,
+ *filename_ptr ? NULL : filename_ptr,
+ functionname_ptr);
+ return TRUE;
+ }
msec = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".mdebug");
if (msec != NULL)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
