https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553

--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi John,

  I have checked in the patch to document the .largecomm directive.

  I do not think that .ldata, .lbss or .lrodata exists as assembler
  directives, so I do not plan on documenting these unless you can
  demonstrate a way to reproduce them.

  A scan of the x86 assembler sources indicates that there are still
  some other undocumented directives however: .code16gcc, .secrel32,
  .operand_check, .sse_check, .disallow_index_reg, and .allow_index_reg.

  So I will leave this PR open as a reminder that they ought to be
  documented one day.

Cheers
  Nick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to