https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- Hi John, I have checked in the patch to document the .largecomm directive. I do not think that .ldata, .lbss or .lrodata exists as assembler directives, so I do not plan on documenting these unless you can demonstrate a way to reproduce them. A scan of the x86 assembler sources indicates that there are still some other undocumented directives however: .code16gcc, .secrel32, .operand_check, .sse_check, .disallow_index_reg, and .allow_index_reg. So I will leave this PR open as a reminder that they ought to be documented one day. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils