https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22626
--- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra <amo...@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=63f452a8bfd9c89b56dcc087cea84151e7a9ec24 commit 63f452a8bfd9c89b56dcc087cea84151e7a9ec24 Author: Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> Date: Mon Dec 18 22:27:08 2017 +1030 PR22626, invalid dynindx used for dynamic relocs against section syms _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms is called twice by the linker. The first call in bfd_elf_size_dynamic_sections is just to answer the question as to whether there are there any dynamic symbols. The second call in bfd_elf_size_dynsym_hash_dynstr sets the st_shndx value that dynamic symbols will have. strip_excluded_output_sections is called between these two calls. So sections seen on the first _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms pass might differ from those seen on the second pass. Unfortunately, that can result in a stripped section's dynamic symbol being assigned a dynindx on the first pass but not corrected to the final value (of zero, ie. not dynamic) on the second pass. PowerPC, x86, mips, and most other targets that emit dynamic section symbols, just test that section symbol dynindx is non-zero before using a given section symbol in dynamic relocations. This patch prevents _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms from setting any section symbol dynindx on the first pass. PR 22626 * elflink.c (_bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms): Don't set section dynindx when section_sym_count is NULL. (bfd_elf_size_dynamic_sections): Pass NULL section_sym_count to preliminary _bfd_elf_link_renumber_dynsyms call. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
