https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22450
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Created attachment 10611
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10611&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi H.J.
What do you think of this patch ?
I was wondering if we should complain if we do not find any suitable bfd
(ie has_properties == TRUE, first_pfd == NULL and there was an input file
of the correct class and machine code). But I guess that if the user has
not supplied an object file with the .note.gnu.property section then they
probably do not want one in the output file either.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
