https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22324

Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |nickc at redhat dot com
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Eager,

I would not really count this as a bug - after all the same effect could be
achieved by using a very large positive value - but I take the point that the
assembler could handle it better.  So I have checked in a variation of your
patch which includes an update to the documentation - noting that negative
counts are not allowed, a update to the assembler testsuite - to check that the
error message is generated, and a few type fixes in the code to ensure that we
are using unsigned values for the count.

Cheers
  Nick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to