https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
Mark Wielaard <mjw at fedoraproject dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mjw at fedoraproject dot org
--- Comment #12 from Mark Wielaard <mjw at fedoraproject dot org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #4)
> (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> > I think that this may be a mistake in the documentation however, as this
> > does not appear to match the behaviour of the code.
>
> It is, because the intent (I added this feature initially) was to pass in the
> DIE offset -- I suppose I used the term "number" because DIEs are always
> referred to by offset, so I didn't consider any possible confusion here.
Not every offset is a DIE "number". There is some slight confusion what happens
if the offset is in the middle of a DIE, should it back up and print that one
or should it start printing at the first offset after that is a DIE "number"?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
