https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> --- > If there is a program bug: > ... > may lead to undesired behavior. Quite so. > -z dynamic-undefined-weak applies if there is a DT_NEEDED entry which > may provide definition for undefined weak reference at run-time. For static > PIE, weak undefined should always be resolved to 0. I agree, which is why I felt it was a good idea to default link_info.dynamic_undefined_weak to 0 when link_info.nointerp. Also, --no-dynamic-linker -z dynamic-undefined-weak probably ought to be an error, or at least warn. However, making that change (or explicitly passing -z nodynamic-undefined-weak) results in x86 tests that fail, due to not generating a plt entry for the undefined weak call. No matter how I look at it, that is a bug in the x86 backend: link_info.dynamic_undefined_weak should not control the generation of a plt entry. (I'm also of the opinion that adding a plt entry for an undefined weak without dynamic relocs is just bloat, but that's a separate issue and one I don't care to argue about.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
