https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #9 from Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de> --- (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #8) > Looking at this, that ld-gc/pr20002 doesn't fail without the patch from > comment #4 is a nice thing, but I think it succeeds for the wrong reasons. The testcase specifically works of course (without patch) because with new binutils these symbols were hidden, and hence not part of the exported set, so dynamic objects involved in the link couldn't have created this problem. But I bet that if you build a shared lib with old binutils (so the __start symbol is exported), and use new binutils to create a shared lib linking against that old shared lib (in such a way that both contain same-named orphane sections) then the same faults can be seen also without patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
