https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21562
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #5) > The patch looks wrong, it appears to ensure that __start_scnfoo is defined. > The linker manual says it shouldn't get defined (scnfoo is not orphan), and > therefore scnfoo should be eliminated due to --gc-sections. > I posted a patch to always define referenced __start_SECNAME/__stop_SECNAME: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-06/msg00105.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
