https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025
--- Comment #13 from Jon Turney <jon.turney at dronecode dot org.uk> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #11) > Have you tried using the latest binutils ? We did make some improvements to > line number caching recent. (Although I think that this was with DWARF not > STABS. Darn). Yes, I'm testing with binutils git master. > Is there a way to reproduce this problem in a Linux environment ? (I ask > because it is much easier for me to debug and fix problems in this > environment). > I did try uploading a copy of libstdc++.a from old cygwin installation > (based upon gcc 5.4.0) and then running "nm -l" on it with a newly built > x86_64-pc-cygin toolchain. It took 7 seconds to complete. So there must be > something that I am doing that does not match what you are doing. I would think that binutils built to handle pe-i386 targets would show the same behaviour on any host. I've attached a tar file containing an unstripped x86 cygstdc++.dll. For me, 'nm -l' on that is very slow, only managing to output a few symbols per second. Reverting 425bd9e1 makes it fast again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
