https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20244
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Dopıng from comment #11) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > > > What I don’t get is why the older GNU ld seems to link these objects files > > > into a shared library just fine. If that’s the case, the older ld must > > > have > > > a way to properly deal with these assembly instructions, right? > > > > The old linker will silently generate broken output. > Hmm. Broken as in ”will probably cause a SIGSEGV or SIGBUS“, or less broken? > 😉 > I’m wondering why nobody noticed this problem before. Is it possible that > the problematic instructions belong to dead code, e.g. are part of a > function that’s (almost) never called, part of a (faulty) generated > exception handler, ...? Or did you find these instructions all over the > place in the Oracle object files? I don't think that piece of code is executed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
