https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20823
--- Comment #7 from ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6) > Yes of course. By the "gas patch", I meant the patch to gas/ that made the > gas Makefile use the acx.m4 machinery. We still have acx.m4 to fix, which > we'll import from gcc when/if that patch goes in. Note that I don't have > any authority to approve the gcc patch, and the gcc folk may well reject it > on the grounds that people with gnu tools won't be using tail anyway, so it > may be better to keep using the ancient form of tail. Hi Alan, Thanks for the reply. I'll keep sending the gcc patch for some time, although I guess you are right... It seems that the gcc guys do not care this tiny problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
