https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20828
--- Comment #7 from James Cowgill <james410 at cowgill dot org.uk> --- (In reply to Maciej W. Rozycki from comment #6) > Do we need to have these hidden symbols in the dynsym table at all in > the first place? It looks like unnecessary clutter to me, they won't > ever be used for anything as their references have been gc-ed. Or am > I missing anything -- can someone confirm my conclusion or contradict > it by providing a use case? Possibly not, although it looks like a generic issue - these symbols appear when the test is run on x86_64. > If we do need these symbols in the dynsym table, then I think we just > need to set GGA_NONE for them correctly as they're being hidden and the > existing dynsym index selection code will DTRT. I don't think doing this will ensure they always appear before the other GGA_NONE global symbols. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
