https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #7 from Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing dot com> --- In an idealized world, yes, we could assume a default unwind rule if none is found, but in the real world, it is safer to just terminate the unwind when no unwind info is present (because more often than not it's broken compiler or somebody forgot to add CFI info to their assembly). Also, note that it's not just the nop, but also the instructions in the CIE that matter. If you are concerned about code size bloat, perhaps the .plt FDE could simply be extended to also cover the .plt.got section in the common case that they are right next to each other (hell, there's enough padding there right now that for small binaries it wouldn't change the code size at all)? Also, it seems like applications which don't care about unwinding at all should simply strip out .eh_frame entirely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
