https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20833
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #5) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3) > > Technically, gold is correct to complain relocation overflow. > > But vvar_vsyscall_gtod_data is in vvar page which is placed before > > vdso page: > > > > 7fffe89d8000-7fffe89da000 r--p 00000000 00:00 0 > > [vvar] > > 7fffe89da000-7fffe89dc000 r-xp 00000000 00:00 0 > > [vdso] > > > > There is no good way to express it. ld happens to store the absolute > > value of 0xffffe080 as 0xffffffffffffe080. > > HJ, is the patch you posted above intended for trunk? Or do you want instead > a -z noreloc-overflow option? I prefer -z noreloc-overflow. I haven't decided if ld should issue an error for relocation overflow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
