https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20531
--- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> --- James Clarke (CC'ed) suggested this might be related to the following change [1]: > Use size_t rather than bfd_size_type > > I noticed when writing _bfd_elf_strtab_save/restore that size_t would > be better than bfd_size_type for a number of things in elf-strtab.c. > Using a 64-bit bfd_size_type on a 32-bit host doesn't make much sense > for array sizes and indices. > [1] > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=ef53be89160126f2fa5dec8f1ec3bd6d99fb0681 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
