https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20513
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
This is better:
index e7a8dff..052b276 100644
--- a/ld/ldmain.c
+++ b/ld/ldmain.c
@@ -959,6 +959,19 @@ multiple_definition (struct bfd_link_info *info,
&& bfd_is_abs_section (nsec->output_section)))
return;
+ /* Ignore a redefinition from excluded section. */
+ if (!bfd_link_relocatable (&link_info)
+ && ((osec->flags & SEC_EXCLUDE) != 0
+ || (nsec->flags & SEC_EXCLUDE) != 0))
+ {
+ if ((osec->flags & SEC_EXCLUDE) != 0)
+ {
+ h->u.def.section = nsec;
+ h->u.def.value = nval;
+ }
+ return;
+ }
+
name = h->root.string;
if (nbfd == NULL)
{
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
