https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20442
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The binutils-2_27-branch branch has been updated by Cary Coutant <ccout...@sourceware.org>: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=652f9c564865f6593c288bdae87944cca4cebdc4 commit 652f9c564865f6593c288bdae87944cca4cebdc4 Author: James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> Date: Wed Aug 10 09:47:45 2016 -0700 Fix improper handling of R_SPARC_GOTDATA_OP_LOX10 relocation. The fall-through in Target_sparc::Relocate::relocate for R_SPARC_GOTDATA_OP_LOX10 is currently R_SPARC_GOT13, but should clearly be R_SPARC_GOT10. GCC has been seen to emit a sethi/xor rather than a sethi/or sequence to load a 32-bit immediate, but if R_SPARC_GOT13 is used then bits 10-12 get zeroed out as both the sethi and xor immediates contain them. gold/ PR gold/20442 * sparc.cc (Target_sparc::Relocate::relocate): R_SPARC_GOTDATA_OP_LOX10 should fall back on R_SPARC_GOT10, not R_SPARC_GOT13. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
