https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19938
Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ccoutant at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com> ---
> > That would work, but is there a reason to not simply
> > translate any non-zero sh_link?
>
> Yes - for OS and Application specific sections the BFD library
> does not know the meaning/interpretation of the sh_link and sh_info
> fields, so it does not know how to translate them.
The sh_link field, when non-zero, is always a section index. It should be
translated if the referenced section is still in the new file, or replaced with
zero if not.
The sh_info field is a section index for SHT_REL and SHT_RELA sections, and for
any section that has the SHF_INFO_LINK flag set. We added that flag
specifically so that tools like objcopy could update the field without knowing
any vendor-specific section types.
-cary
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
