https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, fvogt at suse dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 > > Fabian Vogt <fvogt at suse dot com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED > Resolution|FIXED |--- > > --- Comment #21 from Fabian Vogt <fvogt at suse dot com> --- > (In reply to Richard Guenther from comment #20) > > Hum, so we leave 2.26 broken? > > The 2.26 release is not broken, "only" the binutils-2_26-branch. True. > Reopening to request clarification whether and how that can be solved. A possibility is to revert backporting of the new relocation support. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
