https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19516
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker <bugdal at aerifal dot cx> --- Created attachment 8978 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8978&action=edit proposed fix Producing a symbolic GLOB_DAT relocation for a symbol that has been made local/hidden by setting dynindx to -1 cannot possibly work. It appears the binding of and/or conditions for using a relative relocation rather than a symbolic relocation was just wrong: either symbolic&&def_regular or already-hidden (dynindx==-1) should be sufficient for using a relative relocation, rather than demanding that the symbol be def_regular even if it was already hidden. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
