https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19435
--- Comment #7 from Ian Kronquist <iankronquist at gmail dot com> --- Hi Nick, Those patches fix the problem, or at the very least hide it. Sincerely, Ian Kronquist On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:52 AM, nickc at redhat dot com < sourceware-bugzi...@sourceware.org> wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19435 > > --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- > I missed a bit... > > diff --git a/bfd/mach-o.c b/bfd/mach-o.c > index 72454f9..a712ff6 100644 > --- a/bfd/mach-o.c > +++ b/bfd/mach-o.c > @@ -5798,14 +5798,16 @@ bfd_mach_o_close_and_cleanup (bfd *abfd) > if (mdata->dsym_bfd != NULL) > { > bfd *fat_bfd = mdata->dsym_bfd->my_archive; > +#if 0 > char *dsym_filename = (char *)(fat_bfd > ? fat_bfd->filename > : mdata->dsym_bfd->filename); > +#endif > bfd_close (mdata->dsym_bfd); > mdata->dsym_bfd = NULL; > if (fat_bfd) > bfd_close (fat_bfd); > - free (dsym_filename); > + /*free (dsym_filename);*/ > } > } > > Cheers > Nick > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You reported the bug. > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
