https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19252
--- Comment #2 from Stephen Kell <srk31 at srcf dot ucam.org> --- Thanks for the link. No, I'm not aware of any bug where this changes the program behaviour. Nevertheless, if I don't ask the linker to optimise, I don't think it should. Or, at least, I should be able to ask it not to. Currently the ld manual says that it won't optimise unless passed -On for n greater than zero. It also strongly implies that it won't alter instruction selection unless passed --relax. In any case, the ABI supplement is not a substitute for linker documentation. It might be a start to incorporate the relevant sections of the ABI supplement into a "Machine Dependent" chapter in the ld manual. I might get time, before very long, to write a patch that conditionally disables the optimisation. Please let me know if you think you would apply it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
