https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19172
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 8744 [details]
> > A different patch
>
> How about just printing a warning instead when we ignore the -m option?
>
> diff --git a/gold/parameters.cc b/gold/parameters.cc
> index 15df42a..5f5dae0 100644
> --- a/gold/parameters.cc
> +++ b/gold/parameters.cc
> @@ -301,11 +301,8 @@ set_parameters_target(Target* target)
> {
> const char* emulation = parameters->options().m();
> Target* output = select_target_by_emulation(emulation);
> - if (!output)
> - gold_error(_("unrecognised output emulation: %s"), emulation);
> - else if (output != target)
> - gold_error(_("input file is incompatible with %s output emulation"),
> - emulation);
> + if (output != target)
> + gold_warning(_("ignoring requested emulation %s"), emulation);
> }
> static_parameters.set_target(target);
> }
It is wrong to ignore the unrecognised output emulation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
