https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19145

--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Roelofs from comment #5)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > There are 2 issues:
> > 
> > 1. arm-none-eabi binutils only supports litte-endian.
> > 2. arm-none-eabi GCC only supports little-endian.
> > 
> > To support big-endian, you should configure binutils and GCC for
> > armeb-none-eabi.  Or you fix ARM EABI binutils and GCC to support
> > both little-endian and big-endian.
> 
> I'm not convinced that's actually true. We've shipped working
> arm-none-eabi-{gcc,binutils} toolchains with both the `be;@mbig-endian`
> multilib and the `.;` (little-endian) multilib (among others) before.
> 

Can you show me what you got with "arm-none-eabi-ld -V"?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Reply via email to