On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Mark Rages wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Nick Clifton <ni...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Hans-Peter, > > > >> Nicely, thanks. While there's a point in keeping just one > >> version for simplicity, the educational point of "here's what > >> you may write which doesn't work, here's the semantically > >> corrected code, and this is what you should have written in the > >> first place" wins, IMHO. > > > > > > Good. I have checked in the documentation update. > > > > Cheers > > Nick > > Does this address bug 10774? > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10774
Apparently in part. brgds, H-P _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
