https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14187
--- Comment #5 from Stas Sergeev <stsp at users dot sourceforge.net> --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #3) > The bottom line is that I don't have a good idea for how to fix this to > match the Gnu ld documentation without breaking something. You had to add an option for enabling the gold-specific extensions. Maybe its still not too late? Who knows... > What's difficult about adding the "0x" so that it works with both linkers? It doesn't. Even adding 0x doesn't help because -Ttext in gold means something completely different than in bfd. What works in all cases is only --section-start=.text=0xaddr Its not something that can't be done. But you must be aware that gold being used as a drop-in replacement for ld.bfd results in a broken builds. It also appears to me that gold doesn't search /usr/local/lib by default, so even many autoconf scripts fail. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
