https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18835
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18835 > > H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|NEW |WAITING > > --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- > (In reply to Richard Guenther from comment #2) > > I am storing LTO specific data in them, yes. > > 1. Does linker care what are inside them? Yes, they may contain relocations. > 2. Are they included in executable or shared library? Yes, albeit with a different section name. > If answers for both are "No", can you use a different prefix for > section name, like > > .section .gnu._lto_.debug_str,"MS",@progbits,1 > > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils