https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509
--- Comment #51 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Yuhang Wang from comment #50) > I have just added back LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and all the tests went well (no > unexpected failures). So the culprit is indeed LD_RUN_PATH. Do you recommend > always leave LD_RUN_PATH unset, or make LD_RUN_PATH the same as > LD_LIBARAY_PATH? By the way, why the linker still works fine without > LD_RUN_PATH? The only thing I can tell you is I don't use LD_RUN_PATH myself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
