https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18427
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> --- Hi Dave, > Thanks for helping with this change. > > I'm not sure about the option. Alpha has somewhat similar code without > an option. > > As I understand it, this code is to handle a number of instructions > which require a preceding > label. It usually emitted on the previous line. It seems to me that > changing segments between > the label and its related instruction should be an error. I don't think > this feature is needed > even for the HP-UX SOM target. > > I will check whether GCC needs this for SOM. OK - thanks. If you can confirm that support for this behaviour is no longer needed then I will be happy to go with the simpler patch. (Or maybe the simpler one + an error message if the preceding label cannot be found). I just did not want to break anybody's builds because of a speed optimization, Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
