On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:02:49AM +0000, JONES, BILL wrote: > Defining CFLAGS="-xc99 $CFLAGS" for all binutils causes other issues for > other parts of binutils package. > > #if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L || (defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ >= 2) > /* We can't use any bfd types here since readelf may define BFD64 and > objdump may not. */ > #define HOST_WIDEST_INT long long > #else > #define HOST_WIDEST_INT long > #endif > typedef unsigned HOST_WIDEST_INT elf_vma; > > This code block is specifically looking for C99 or GNU C which to determine > how to make a uint64_t happen for HOST_WIDEST_INT > > This is causing a conflict.
Fixed on master binutils with git commit 4c219c2e. https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-12/msg00112.html -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
