Hi there, I was wondering, is there a known/intended case where gcc + binutils will produce .eh_frame sections with duplicate FDEs? I'm seeing this with gcc 4.8.3 + binutils 2.24 on Haiku, and thought I'd see if this is intentional before I try to come up with a reduced testcase on another platform, as I don't believe all of our patches have been upstreamed at this point. The FDEs in question have the exact same lowpc/highpc, CIE and call frame instructions, the only discernable difference is that they're located in completely different parts of the section.
Unfortunately, I'm not seeing any obvious pattern to the FDEs that are duplicated; some of them map to program counter ranges associated with weak symbols in the target executable that came from a static library that was linked in, while others don't match up with anything at all, so it may take some experimentation to find a way to replicate this behavior in a simplified manner suitable for testing/analysis, so I thought I'd ask here first before I start to attempt that. Regards, Rene _______________________________________________ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
